Diving  is a  potentially  hazardous  activity.  The materials  contained within  this  magazine  are for informational purposes only and are not intended as a substitute for proper and appropriate training.
Site Design and Hosting by Hydro Tech Systems
The Fundamentals of Tech
Before    taking    the   G.U.E.  DIR courses, I considered myself to be a competent  diver -  although  I  still recognised that I had a lot to learn; like  how  to   swim  backwards!  So what  prompted  me to  do  the two courses, Fundamentals and Tech 1?
by Ian Parkin
(A Dive  Master and enthusiastic  technical diver  already qualified  in trimix - and who regularl y dives the  deeper wrecks around Sydney - Ian Parkin, ('Parky', to those  who know him) recently took  part in the Fundamentals and Tech 1 courses, conducted by Global  Underwater Explorers Train-
ing   Director,   Andrew   Georgitsis,
together  with  
G.U.E.  Instructors,
Martin  Lorenzo   and  Gideon  Liew,
held in Sydney in  early September.
He describes his impressions of the
two programmes.)
Andrew Georgitsis (L) gives 'Parky' pointers in gas management drills
The  real  clincher  was  listening to  those people  who  had  taken  the  Fundamentals programme last  year and  how  much they had  enjoyed  and  learned  from  it.  (I also thought  that learning how to swim backwards would  be a cool thing to be able to do!)
As for  Tech-1?  Well, in  for a  penny....  (My thinking  on this was, "Well,  I'll pick up a few diving techniques.  I may not learn very much, but you just never know.")

In the  months  leading  up to  the  course, I  talked  with others  who  had  taken  the programme.  The  more  I  heard  about Tech-1, the  more I  thought, "Bloody  Hell, if I manage to complete the course, let alone pass it, it'll be a miracle!"

To make myself feel better, I kept telling  myself that it wouldn't give me a qualification that I didn't already have.  And if I failed, so what?  It's only money! (And that's from a Yorkshireman!)
So what were the programmes like?

Fundamentals:
The programme began  with a day spent in the classroom learning about DIR/GUE, what the course entailed, and how to properly rig the gear.

Day Two started with land drills.  Now, I really couldn't see the point in this prior to the in-water  training.  As far as I could  make it, it was  designed to  make you  lie on  the beach  practicing various techniques in front  of the public and  looking foolish!  I mean, I'm  brilliant  at  walking  round  all  day - although  at  night,  after  a  few  beers,  it's sometimes a bit  different - In fact, I've done it  for years!  But having  practiced  all of our skills, it was off into the water for a couple of days.
This is where the  fun began.  It  was brilliant and  lived up to all  of the  expectations that I'd  gathered   from  those  who  had  already taken  the   course.   However,  despite   the emphasis that  both they and  the instructors placed on trim, I had failed to appreciate just how  critical  it is.  If  your  trim's  crap  then your buoyancy  is  crap, making  it  difficult - because  you're  all  over the place - to carry out  the  skills.  Everything falls  apart around you. This  becomes   apparent  when   you're expected   to   demonstrate   a    skill   while hovering without moving. 
Martin Lorenzo teaching Parky (L) Anna and Richard new finning techniques
That's  the expectation.   The reality  is somewhat  different!  Imagine  a  scuba  diver having an epileptic fit  underwater and  you'll get  the picture  that I - and  everybody else  doing the programme - presented.  (All of  the in-water  exercises are video'd for later review!) 

Funnily, enough the skills that we had practiced on land - which didn't include trim and buoyancy - seemed easier  to perform, although they still looked  terrible on the video. At this point, the elusive backward kick was still one flip forward and one flip back!
After the  first in-water session and  video debrief - and  not looking at all 'cool' in the water - I now  fully expected to  fail Fundamentals.  The up side being  that I wouldn't fail Tech1  because I'd  never get to  sit it  and I'd have  a lot of time to  practice the skills.   Every cloud, I tried to convince myself, has a silver lining.

After another  day spent in  the  ocean  polishing  and  refining the  skills, my trim was apparently  showing signs of improvement.   My finning techniques, however, were still short of perfect; especially the backward kick which, in my case, was all forward!  But there's hope.  We all passed and could now go away and practice.

This  was  a  great  course,  and  an  absolute  heap  of  fun.  Just  seeing  your  own performance on  video was an  added  advantage.  Particularly when  you believe that you're all finesse in the water!  

I have no hesitation in recommending this course to absolutely everyone who dives. It won't turn you  into a legend over night, but it will  give you the necessary  knowledge of basic skills that will help make your diving  so much easier and a lot more enjoyable.

And for those who  wonder about how  best to  prepare for  Fundamentals?  The short answer is, Don't!
Tech 1:
Having only just completed the  Fundamentals programme, I was left  with few illusions as to the state of my competency in  the water.  I recognised that it was unlikely that I'd pass, but if I'd learned  so much in Fundamentals  then I knew  that I would learn a lot from the Tech 1 course.

At  that  point, I  still  didn't  really  know  what  to  expect,  other  than  that  if  the Fundamentals  course was  anything to go by, there'd be  a lot more to it and it would be difficult.

Without  going into day-by-day detail, the teaching  methodologies used in Tech 1 are the  same as for Fundamentals  and  consist  of  lectures,  land-based drills,  in-water work,   video   debriefs,  repetition   and   pointers  on   how   to  improve.   (The  skill requirements   are   also   listed   in  the  course   outline   on  the  GUE   website  at:
http://www.gue.com/)
What particularly struck me was the intensity of the course.  Doing 12 hours a day for 5 days, with an  average  of  around 3  hours a  day  spent  in  the water, it's  full  on learning.  The in-water training is all that  you'd expect from a Technical diving course, with  out-of-gas scenarios, simulated  regulator failures, lift  bag deployment, no-mask work, ascents  involving simulated decompression, gas switches and so on; and all this to  be  performed in  trim  with  perfect  buoyancy:  Techniques  that  you  learned  in Fundamentals and subsequently practiced.
I  would  say,  at  this  point,  that  if  you've managed    to    master   the   skills    in   the Fundamentals  course,  then  Tech  1  wil l be made  a  lot  easier.  Once  again,  all  of  the in-water  training  is  videod  and  critiqued at the end of each day. 

At the  end of  the first  day,  we  all believed that  we'd  performed  quite  well  -  until  the video  review.  This is where it was drilled into us  exactly where  and  what our faults were. Mine  were  exactly  what  I  expected;  trim, trim, finning, and buoyancy while motionless -
Andrew Georgitsis (back to camera) supervising Anna and Parky in line laying procedures
all of  the skills that  I hadn't yet mastered  from the Fundamentals  programme - with the addition of one other thing that  all of us had problems with, a term that I'd never heard  much about before the  course, and one  that was  subsequently drilled into us constantly: "Situational Awareness".
To me, prior to the Tech 1 course, Situational Awareness meant, among  other things, knowing  the  dive  plan, where my  buddy  was and  where  I was during the dive.  It certainly didn't encompass  the three million and one things that we were expected to know at any  one  point during  the  dive, such as:  Where  is  everyone?  Can  I  see them?  Can they  see me?  Who's got the most gas?  Who's got the least?  Who's the best person  to go  to if  there's a gas  problem?  How much  gas  have  I used in  the past  5  minutes  compared  to  what  was  planned? How  much  gas will I use in  the next 5 minutes?  Is my  position the best  for the  team? If my  trim's out, why?  (The correct   answer  to  which  is   not  mine  of, "because  my  trim's  never  in!")  What direction  are we  swimming in?  Which is the quickest  direction to the  ascent point?
These are  just a few  of the things that you are  expected to think about  and remember. The list  is endless  and  if you want to know them  all  then  do  the course.  Suffice it to say  that my  two  favourites on the lengthy list were  numbers "463 - Look at  the pretty fish" and, "464 - look at the rusty metal".

By the end of Day One, I was fully convinced that I was, undoubtedly, totally incompetent in the  water  and  the  worst  buddy  in  the world   as  I  watched   my   performance  in glorious technicolour on the big screen.
As the course  progresses, the in-water work  is geared  towards not  only performing the skills  correctly, but also to  improving one's  Situational  Awareness abilities, with each day encompassing  more and more skills in increasingly  more difficult situations.
During the  course we were  also fortunate to  have  two  Tech 1 Trainee Instructors present, whose one-on-one help in perfecting various Fundamentals and Tech 1 skills, I found invaluable.

By the  last day, (and I was  surprised that I got  there), my trim  was spending more time  in than out,  and I actually  managed to  get to  Item # 463 twice  on the same dive - although I still can't swim backwards! 
Gearing up
The  classroom theory  and procedures work   were   excellent  and   far  more comprehensive than  I had experienced on  any  previous  course.   (You  only have to read the Tech 1 manual to get an idea of what to expect.  The added bonus,  however,  is  that  the  course teaches  all  sorts  of  tips, tricks  and techniques that are not included in the manual.)  Beware of the exam, though, it takes forever!

By the end of the  course, my in water skills   had   improved   by   leaps  and bounds and my head  was  full  of  the answers    to     previously    unknown questions.  But a  word  of  advice:  If you  are  intending  to  do  this course then  be  prepared to have your diving
Tech 1 boat Dive
skills and abilities  pulled apart and then put  back together again.  Don't expect to be molly  coddled.  Some people  like  this  approach, some  don't.  I didn't mind  it at all. Also  be prepared  for the  fact that, by the  end of the  course, you will probably  be disillusioned  about  your own  and  everybody else's previous lack of  dive and buddy skills!  I am!  But  that's just  me, and it's  something that I intend to try and remedy.
Above all, don't  expect to be  turned into  a superior diver by the  end of the course. You might improve during the  programme; you  might not!  But I can  guarantee that you'll know  the level of skill  you'll need to  have  at its end.  It's just  that you won't have it!  If you want it, you'll have to go out and work at it.
Jarrod Jablonski, President of G.U.E. & Richard Nicholls, Dive Centre Manly, co-ordinator of programmes.
I  wouldn't   recommend   this   course  for every one, but  for those people who want to take  part in technical  diving activities, regardless    of   their   current   level   of qualifications,  it's  well  worth  it.  As I've mentioned previously, it's intensive but not impossible, very, very rewarding and if you want   to   prepare   for  it,  practice  and perfect  all of  the  Fundamentals  skills to the  point  where  they   become   second nature - and  make  sure  that you've  got nothing else to think  about for a week but the  course and  diving.  Also  ensure that your kit is  configured as you  learned that it  should  be  -  and  get  yourself a good torch, they are invaluable.
Visit Global Underwater Explorers