Diving  is a  potentially  hazardous  activity.  The materials  contained within  this  magazine  are for informational purposes only and are not intended as a substitute for proper and appropriate training.
Site Design and Hosting by Hydro Tech Systems
"Subsunk!"
The 'Affray' Tragedy.
by George Wookey edited by David Strike
On the 16th  April, 1951, a British  submarine - HMS/M Affray, one  of several  of her class  built during WWII - put to sea in  the English Channel on a  peaceful, simulated war mission.

Affray's total  complement of 75 officers and  men included, on  this occasion, a class of 23  junior officers undergoing submarine  training and  a small unit  of  Royal Marine Commandos.  The sea going orders for  Affray were liberal.  Her Captain had  freedom of  movement to land the Commandos - using  collapsible  canoes - on  any part  of a stretch of the south-west coast of England on a shore assault exercise. 

S/M Affray  was one of a class  of submarines  that  had been  built  with the snorkel device - a  pneumatically raised  and lowered  steel tube which, when  in the vertical position allowed  passage  of  air  to  the  engine room  permitting  the  submarine  to proceed  below the surface  at periscope  depth.  By  this  means a  submarine  need never come right to the surface and reveal her position to an enemy.
Hinged  to   the  hull,  on   the  port  side  of   the submarine abreast  of the after end of the conning tower,  the  snorkel  lies  horizontal  when   in  it's lowered position.   At its top end was a float valve that  closed  automatically  if  the  submarine  was taken below its periscope depth while running.

At  the  point  where  the  air  intake  entered  the actual pressure hull of  the submarine there  was a bulbous casting - projecting  about two feet above the pressure hull - that  housed the main induction valve.   Manually operated  from within  the engine room   this   very   important  casting  was  totally concealed and protected by the free flooding deck casing.

Affray left her home base at about 1600 hrs on the 16th April.  Normally  submarines would  make radio contact  at  set periods - usually 0800  and 2000 - each day,  reporting  position,  course and  speed. Her report on  the  16th  had been  made  normally and  the  last contact, about  2100,  had  included Affray's forecast position at noon on the 17th.
Here's the Snort Mast on Artemis in 1950, similar to the Snort mast of the Affray that apparently cracked and caused the Affary tragedy.
It was usual to  travel from point A to point B well  below periscope  depth - the main engines then being powered by the submarine's enormous banks of electric batteries - and only occasionally was there a need to come to periscope depth in order to run on the diesel engines and re-charge the batteries.

The snorkel tube on  Affray originally housed  both the air  intake and  battery  vents, but a later modification altered this arrangement making both tubes within the snorkel air intakes, while the battery vent was  moved to the after  end of the upper conning tower.
When, on the 17th, Affray failed to make radio contact with the Commander-in-Chief's Southern Command H.Q. an  immediate report  was made  to  the Admiralty in London, who a t once  flashed the  Codeword, "SUBSMASH" to  the British Fleet  and combined NATO navies.

The  well  established  and  practiced,  R.N./S.M. search  and  rescue  organisation  is spread  between the  naval resources around  the British  Isles.  Included  among  the vessels was  the deep diving and S/M rescue  ship, H.M.S.  Reclaim - at that  time the most up-to date craft of her type in the world.

At 24-hours notice for steam, the bulk of Reclaim's crew were on leave, only a nucleus of officers and  men remaining on  board.  Fortunately  this included  the Engineer, the Medical Officer, both Diving Officers, (one of whom was George Wookey), plus 4 divers and 1 telegraphist.

While  the  Base  Staff  ashore  undertook the recall  of the  other officers  and  crew, those on-board loaded stores and prepared the ship for sea.  Within a matter of hours mooring lines were slipped and Reclaim  was at sea,  quickly followed  by other ships in the search organisation.
HMS RECLAIM, the Royal Navy's deep diving and Submarine Rescue vessel.
On average the Subsmash  organisation was called into  action about once every two years.  Seldom had the signal  changed to "SUBSUNK", the signal  when it is positively known that  the submarine has been  critically damaged  or sunk.  (Usually  the signal "Subsurfaced" was received after a few hours - the delay in signal transmission having been caused by some technical difficulty).

No such signal was received from Affray, and as  the hours turned into days, with still no   indication  of  Affray's  whereabouts,  despair  settled  over  the  fleet.   It   was considered  that under  no  circumstances could  the  crew  of  a sunken, undamaged submarine survive after a maximum of four or five days.

The  search  continued  for many  weeks  in  what  proved  to  be  some  of the most unseasonable weather of the year.  During this time a total of 13 sonar contacts were made, each  thought to be  Affray.  On each  occasion Reclaim  would  moor over the site while divers descended, only to discover yet another uncharted casualty of World War II.
A near  fatality  occurred  on  one  of these  diving  investigations  when  diver - Petty Officer Hall, became ensnared on tangled wreckage at a depth of 200 ft.  His telephone breast  rope became trapped and, unable to free himself, Hall was overcome by a rising percentage  of carbon-dioxide, resulting  in  mounting  hysteria  which  could clearly be heard over his intercom.  Abruptly his  intercom became dead.  His breast rope became slack and  was quickly pulled to the surface with no diver on its end.  Immediate horror turned to relief as Hall  surfaced, feet first, down  tide about 50-metres from the ship's side.   Quickly hauled  back to  the diving door  by his  attendants  pulling  on  his  still connected air-line, Hall was pulled inboard,  thankfully still conscious  but very wet and cold.  He  was quickly rushed to the RCC and subjected  to therapeutic decompression, later emerging little the worse for his terrifying ordeal.

Had Hall surfaced in the upright attitude it is likely  that he would have drowned from a flooded suit caused by the hole left in his helmet when the breast rope was torn away!
George Wookey, standing top right of picture, Petty Officer Hall seated, bottom left.
P.O. Hall who became entangled in Affray wreckage at a depth of 200 feet.
The search pattern for Affray systematically widened: Areas previously searched were again  gone over in  very difficult weather.  Then,  on the  14th  June - in a previously searched  area north of  Guernsey Island - another sonar contact was  made near the Hurd Deep, a submarine channel which shelved steeply into very deep water.

Once again Reclaim made a four point  moor over the contact in water almost 300 feet deep.   In spite of extremely strong  tides in the area a diver  quickly left  the surface. Although swept away from  his shot-rope by the strong  tide before  reaching  the sea bed, he reported seeing a long, white painted handrail. 

Because  nothing further  could be accomplished  by diving  until  the next slack water period - about  6 hours  away - it was decided  to  trial  an  experimental  underwater television  camera that, because  of  its  frail,  cumbersome  nature  and  difficulty  of handling,  had  lain on  board,  unused, during  the  earlier  weeks  of  searching.  The camera's operators  were both on  board, one  of them - Commander 'Buster' Crabbe - later losing his life while diving on a visiting Russian cruiser, the 'Ordzhonikidze'.

The television  camera was  carefully  lowered  by  a  sceptical  bunch of  divers while 'Buster'  and  his  assistant  manned  the   controls  of   the   monitor   receiver.  Very dramatically the first picture to be seen as the camera approached the wreck was the name  'YARFFA'  (Affray in reverse)  before  the  camera, too,  was swept  away down tide.   Tremendous   excitement   quickly   spread   throughout   the  crew.   Work  on determining the cause of the accident could now begin.

As  the  camera  swung  clear   of  the  name  on   the  conning  tower,  swept  away dramatically  by the strong tide, it gave  a brief  view of  the base  end  of the snorkel tube, where one  obvious cause of  the  disaster quickly became apparent.  Appearing to be  almost completely snapped off, the snorkel tube lay  in a  most unusual  manner athwartships with its float valve resting in the sea bed about 30 feet from the break.
Trialling the underwater TV camera.
There  then began a systematic  and detailed  examination  of  the  hull  and  external fittings  of Affray  using all available  resources - including  the underwater T/V; a one man,  'Roberto   Galleazi'   observation  chamber,  and   suited  divers  whenever  tidal conditions allowed.

The  Affray lay on her  port side, almost 30  degrees from the  vertical.  Over the next few months she was to slowly subside to an angle of approximately 50 degrees.

Since the snorkel was found to be almost  completely broken off, leaving only a narrow flap of  metal  about 4  inches wide, and anticipating  that the  connecting  metal flap would break, it was decided to place a sling  around the float valve at the head of the snorkel and lift it by a winch wire to the surface.
Getting the diver down  to the float valve, which  rested in the  sea bed directly under the listing conning  tower, posed  complications, the diver having to pass  through the extended  after periscope and  telescopic radar  aerial, very  close to  a tangle of lose radio aerials.

The diver's  shot rope - down  which he would descend - had been positioned as close as  possible by using the T/V camera to  direct its  lowering.  The subsequent physical effort  involved in  dragging wire sling  and recovery wire from the  shot to the snorkel float valve  in strong tidal  conditions at  such depths  resulted  in at  least  one  diver contracting the bends.
After numerous  attempts the task was  finally  completed on
an  unusually fine and  calm day.  The snorkel  was  success-
fully  lifted to the surface and subjected to  a detailed exam-
ination  which revealed  metal  fatigue  at the  break  but  no
other damage whatsoever.  Welded join s in the fairing plates
running  the length of the snorkel  were   positioned  opposite
one another  at the break and were  acknowledged as having
been a weak link in the snorkel's structure.

It was open to speculation as to  what had caused the metal,
weakened  by  fatigue,  to  break.   Had  it  been  because of
collision with another  vessel?   No  such  incident  had  been
reported  and subsequent  examination  of  the visible part of
the hull  revealed no  apparent  damage.  The after periscope
and radar  aerial were both in the fully extended  position but were  unmarked:  Bridge telegraphs were both positioned to stop:  Hydroplanes were set hard to rise, indicating a  last, desperate  attempt  to  surface.  Could it  have been the  sudden  shock of an internal  battery explosion?  (Most informed  opinion later believed this to be  the most likely cause.)

Had any  attempt  been  made to  shut  the  main  snorkel  induction  valve?  Knowing whether the valve's position was either  shut or open, could help solve the mystery of what actually happened.  If found to be shut then there must be some other cause for Affray's sinking!
The ingress of  water  through the  two exposed  fractured  tubes  within  the  snorkel would  have  been  terrifyingly  rapid.  It was  calculated that  the engine  room  alone would have  taken only 4 minutes to completely flood and there is little doubt that the interior  watertight  bulkhead  doors would  have  collapsed  under the  strain - rapidly extending the flooding throughout the submarine.

One can imagine  the chaos and  sudden panic  when, with  sea water pouring in at an alarming  rate, Affray lost her  normal trim and the  crew,  struggling to keep their feet and  composure, in  desperate efforts  to get at, and operate, the  necessary valves - probably hindered by the many trainees on board - finally succumbed to the inevitable.

Short of actually getting inside  the engine  room - a virtually  impossible task to carry out safely  in view of the extremely  adverse  tidal  conditions - some  way  had to be found to determine the "open" or "closed"  position of the main snorkel induction valve.

Among the options  considered, and subsequently  carried out, was the clearing of the upper deck casing covering the area using a mechanical grab directed by a diver inside an observation  chamber.  An attempt would  then be made to photograph the casting housing the induction valve using  a radio-active source, whose  rays would penetrate the casting, in  the expectation that an  image of  the  internal position  of  the  valve would  be recorded on the very large, waterproofed, photographic  plate placed on the side of the  casting opposite  the source.  A technique  never before attempted under such conditions.
Trialling the 'Squalus' submarine rescue bell.
The radio-active  source, about the size  of  a pea and  enclosed  in a  lead  container mounted in  a magnetic frame, was sent down  the shot rope  to the sea bed to await positioning  by the diver  carrying the  photographic  plate.  This was to be  positioned first,  the diver then  removing the  lead  plug  in  the  radio-active  container  -  thus allowing  the radio-active  rays to be  emitted - and attaching the magnetised units to the casting.

Several different time  exposures were  taken, varying  between 6 and  24 hours, that were largely  governed by the intervals between  successive  tides.  The photographic results were not entirely encouraging, but  it is believed that one of the plates showed a faint trace of the induction valve in the "open" position.
In  November, 1951, with  no conclusive  proof  as to  the  cause  of  the  sinking, the Admiralty,  for several  reasons - not the least  of which was the danger to each diver as he  made his  way down through  a tangled  web  of  wires and  torn  deck casing - decided to discontinue  work on Affray, leaving the wreck without further disturbance.

Although it was considered that the fractured snorkel had been responsible for Affray's loss, there was insufficient  evidence to enable any definite opinion to be formed as to what had actually initiated the tragic course of events.
As a  consequence of  Affray's sinking  a decision  was  made  to  purchase, from  the United States  Navy, a  complete  "Squalus"  submarine  rescue  bell.  A  system  used successfully by  the Americans and based  on the principle of  rescue from the surface without the need for assistance from within a stricken submarine.

The  principle always used by  the Royal Navy was  that the  initiative  for escape has been on the S/M's crews' own efforts.

Successful  trials  where  the  "Squalus"  bell  actually  operated  down to  500 feet of water,  at angles  of up  to 35 degrees  from  the  vertical and  in currents  of up to 5 knots, were  exhaustively made by  divers  operating  from HMS Reclaim.  However the 'Squalus"  rescue principle  was never  popular  with  the  S/M  service,  and  with the subsequent  introduction  of  a 100 foot S/M  escape  training  tank at HMS Dolphin, a method of  free ascent without  the use  of equipment was developed.  A system that has subsequently been improved upon.

In  1956, George  Wookey, operating  from  HMS  Reclaim, established  a  world depth record for  a diver  wearing flexible  dress of  600 feet.  A record that remains  intact through to the present day.