Diving  is a  potentially  hazardous  activity.  The materials  contained within  this  magazine  are for informational purposes only and are not intended as a substitute for proper and appropriate training.
Site Design and Hosting by Hydro Tech Systems
Heart Pacemakers and Diving
By Peter Fields
Peter Fields
In early 1994, a random ECG check  revealed a 'left bundle  branch block' in my heart.  In  layman's terms  this meant that one of  the nerve paths that control heartbeat had 'carked it'!  Probably due to a dissolute diver's life lived much too fully over too many years. 

A cardiologist at the time  explained it as, 'having lost a redundant system, that there was another  parallel system  still in place and working  and that  at some time in the vague  and indefinite future I  may need a  pacemaker.'  I continued diving, albeit  more conservatively  in  regards  to current  and exertion.  But  in August of that  year, when John Riley and  I found the wreck of the 'MYOLA' off Long Reef, in Sydney, my regular diving depths increased to 160 feet.  Although I was cautious there were  times when I experienced  'funny' episodes at depth.
In  January, 1995,   after  a  celebratory  Christmas  'drink', the  'other  system'
went down.  My pulse dropped to an alarming 37 and I was diagnosed with total heart block, a  term used to describe the  failure of the heart's nervous sheath. A pacemaker  was now  a life-saving  necessity and  after  a 50  minute,  local-
anaesthetic operation one was in place.

During this  period I resigned  myself to the  end of my  thirty-plus  years diving career,  but  enquiries  elicited  the  knowledge  that  I could, in  fact, continue diving.  The big  question,  of  course, was under  what conditions?   and, more importantly, to what depth?
Shortly after my  release from hospital I  called the pacemaker manufacturers in Texas and spoke  with one of the  company's engineers.  She  advised  me that they  had  dived  my  model  to  195  feet  but  that  they  were  only  able  to recommend the 'normal' sports limits of 140 feet.

When you have a  device implanted in  you that is  a life-support system device
you tend to get a bit  'twitchy' about pushing  it to its limits.  I really wanted to know  a  bit  more  about  pacemakers and  depth  limits, information  that  was difficult to come  by.  My commercial  diving days are  long gone, so deep diving depths weren't a  consideration, but I was really  unhappy about being stuck at 140 feet when the 'MYOLA' was twenty feet below me.

An old  friend,  Murray Conlon of  Southern Tasmanian  Divers in Hobart  told me
that  he'd  had a  pacemaker  for  years  and regularly  dived the  wreck  of the
'NORD', a Tasmanian wreck lying at - 140 feet!  Not much help!
My luck  improved  when I was  put  in touch with  Alex Watson, who  runs  the
Bioengineering  Unit at  Sydney's  Prince  Henry  Hospital.  These are the people who handle  the supply of  pacemakers and  who have all  of the technology for
service testing and checking.

I explained  my problem to  Alex, a diver  of  longstanding,  who suggested  that
if I obtained a small pressure  pot then he would arrange a  'test dive' of sample pacemakers.  Rick  Poole  of Pro-Diving  services provided  me with  an excellent small portable pressure  pot and test  gauge and Alex  and I began  our series of tests. 

We first test  dived a pacemaker model similar to my own ten times to 200 feet, carrying out  external electrical  function tests  following  dives one, two,  three and ten.  In  each instance  the pacemaker  showed no  signs of  malfunctioning and the test machinery printouts were quite satisfactory.

The next, and  toughest test, was  two dips to 300  feet, dives that bulged the
thick perspex  lid on the pot and that  resulted in a measurable distortion to the pacemaker  case when a straight  edge was applied.  Even after  this abuse the pacemaker still tested OK.
Alex watson tests a pacemaker after a 300 ft dive.  Two units lie on the desk next to the pressure pot."
Our experiments were obviously  too small a sample from which to draw any firm conclusions  other  than: That  the model  I am  fitted  with  will do  all that  its manufacturers claim  for it:  That  their conservative  suggested limits  are quite safe; and that there's  a considerable safety  margin, or  fudge  factor, built  in.

I am  indebted to  long time  diver and  all round  good guy, Alex Watson  for his
invaluable help in  reassuring me that the small watch-sized unit implanted in my left breast can keep me ticking  over at least  as far down  as the 'MYOLA'.  It's 'heartening' to know!
Pacemakers - An Update

S
ince  writing  the  above  story in  1996,  there  have  been  some  interesting developments in the pacemaker  story, the chief  of which  had some  serious, if not deadly, consequences.

Battery life in a  pacemaker is about  5-7 years as it delivers its  tiny continuous pulses  down the wires  embedded  into the  heart  muscle.  Checked  every  six months  or  so, when  the unit's  output voltage  tapers to  a pre-set  level  the device is accessed surgically under local anesthetic, separated from its wires by pop-out terminals and a new unit is implanted.  All routine thus far.

However, in  2000, when  my unit's  voltage  dropped to  the replacement  level things started  to go  quite  wrong and  the  story  becomes a  cautionary  tale. Routine replacement  took place  without difficulty and I quizzed the surgeon as to the  suitability  of the  unit  for  scuba  diving.  I  was  assured  it  was  fine. WRONG! It was only my caution and scepticism that saved my life.
While I was waiting for the minor surgery to heal, I did a routine check by calling the pacemaker manufacturers in the USA, a  conglomerate which had meanwhile absorbed the Texas  outfit which had  manufactured  by old unit.  I got  evasive replies and a  lab technician  who had  offered - as a fellow diver - to find some test data for me was gagged and prevented from telling me anything other than that  the unit was  suitable for hyperbaric  treatment depths of  45 feet/ 12 odd metres.

I stopped  talking to  America  and contacted  the local  distributor,  fortunately encountering another  technician who  was a diver.  He  offered to  make a unit available  for  testing, which  we duly  did, diving  it  in the  medical lock of Rick Poole's, Pro Diving Services,  chamber.  Dived and  tested to 100 feet/30 metres the unit was ok except for  slight case buckling, but a  dive to 170 feet crushed the  case.  It would  have been  'goodnight McGuinness'  for me  had I dived the unit to my usual 50 plus metres depths.
I then  set  about  finding the whys  and  how to get a  suitable  diving-capable pacemaker.  I drew blanks at  NSW's Prince Henry  Hyperbaric unit and the same at Royal Adelaide.  I put out  feelers on  the world-wide-web.  No joy.  I figured out the why though.  Case  design, an electronically  welded titanium container, helium immersed  and tested in  a vacuum post-welding  for any molecular leaks, (the ingress of  bodily fluid into  a unit would be potentially fatal in many cases) had not changed over the years but battery  technology had improved radically. Whereas a pacemaker's volume had been almost totally taken up by battery bulk in the past, now there was a considerable gas gap as battery size shrank.

My astute  occasional diving lady  companion  suggested I check  with Dr Simon Mitchell,  who  was  at  the  time  running   the  Wesley  Hyperbaric  facility,  in Brisbane.  Simon was  brilliant.  He had  a table  of efficacy of  pacemakers from various manufacturers, ranging  from the very best to the mediocre in pressure-
resistant terms.
The best, a model from St Jude Medical in California, was rated to 230 feet (the Yanks are delightfully non-metric!) so I arranged a meeting with the cardiologist, assured him I wasn't going to sue his tits off, and asked for a good one.  Wiping imaginary sweat  from his brow  he asked when?   As soon as possible, I replied, and duly got  a good one implanted  in January 2001; one  that has safely taken me to  nearly 55  metres  on the  Aaron Ward, in  the  Solomons, and  back and which has done many 50 metre dives in the interval.

The  caution  in  the   cautionary  tale?   Should  you,  or  any   of  your  diving acquaintances   need  to  be  fitted   with  a  pacemaker,  do  your  homework; understand that diving and pressure effects are not widely or well understood in the medical profession and  the manufacturers  have been slow in  disseminating adequate  information, and  question closely  and persistently  until you see the relevant data.  Remember, it's  your life  at stake.  Well-meaning assurances are of little value if they result in your being laid out on a slab.
Born in New Zealand, Peter  Fields began diving in  1961 with the inverted twin-
cylinder, 'Porpoise', single hose regulator set.   Certified as a CMAS Instructor in 1969,  he  co-founded  New  Zealand's  first, 'pay  for tuition'  dive  school  and worked as a commercial diver and partner in Diving Services NZ Ltd, during the early  'seventies,  before  joining  two  companions  in a  sailing  voyage to  the Southern  Ocean  and  South  America,  searching  for, and  diving, shipwrecks. Moving  to  Australia  in  1978, he  managed  the  Moray-Dacor   distributorship before establishing  his own  company, Fields  Henry Pty Ltd, in 1981.  The sole Australian distributor for Scubapro through until 1990, he subsequently became a  partner  in  Pacific  Commercial  Diving  Supply;  equipment  supplier  to  the Commercial and Military.   Co-discoverer,  (with John Riley) of Sydney's last big shipwreck, the  'Myola', missing  since 1919.  He  still searches  for other minor wrecks on  a regular weekly  basis and is, he says  twinkingly, "burdened with a collection of old friends."
(The account that follows first appeared in  'Professional Diver Journal', in 1996, and is  reproduced here in  order to set the scene  for the  cautionary advice in Peter's, 'Pacemakers - An Update', that appears further down the page. - Ed.)